Home > RESEARCH > University & Independent > U. Florida > Over-Seeded Rough Bluegrass (Poa trivialis) Response to Selected N Sources (2007)
Over-Seeded Rough Bluegrass (Poa trivialis) Response to Selected N Sources (2007) Print E-mail

HTML


 

Research Topic:

Over-Seeded Rough Bluegrass (Poa trivialis) Response to Selected N Sources (2007), J. Sartain, University of Florida
Cool-season turfgrasses respond differentially to N sources depending on their release characteristics, soil texture, and organic matter composition. A field study was established on dormant tifdwarf bermudagrass over-seeded with rough bluegrass with the objective to evaluate the visual quality, growth and N uptake response of different N sources including a new technology meal and soy protein, soluble, traditional and synthetic slow release, traditional organic.
Five N sources (Green Spec 16-4-8 and 7-7-7, ammonium sulfate (AS), 60% IBDU & 40% AS, and Milorganite) were applied at 1.0 lbs N/1000 sq ft/45 days to dormant tifdwarf bermudagrass over-seeded with rough bluegrass. Plots (6 by 9 ft) were arranged in a randomized complete block design and replicated four times. Visual ratings and chlorophyll meter readings were taken weekly. Clippings were collected every 30 days for growth rate and N uptake estimates. The study was run for two 45 day evaluation periods.
Statistically significant differences in visual quality were observed during the second 45 day evaluation cycle relative to N source applied. The Green Spec
16-4-8 and 7-7-7 began the cycle rating approximately 7 in visual quality and ended the cycle at around 6.5, thus these two materials maintained above acceptable quality turfgrass during the entire 45 day cycle. The 60% IBDU and 40% AS mixture began the cycle as an intermediately rated N source but ended the cycle as the top rated mixture. In general, the control plots declined over the evaluation period and completed the evaluation period with a below acceptable level of turfgrass quality. The 7-7-7 material produced superior quality turfgrass and milorganite produced the lowest quality turfgrass of the N sources applied.
When averaged over the entire 90 day period, the Green Spec 7-7-7, AS and IBDU/AS N sources produced equivalent superior chlorophyll meter readings, whereas the Green Spec 16-4-8 and Milorganite produced somewhat lower meter readings. The Green Spec
7-7-7 mixture supplied the largest quantity of N to the turfgrass over the entire 90 day evaluation period. The Green Spec 16-4-8, AS and IBDU/AS mixtures supplied an intermediate level of N and the Milorganite the lowest quantity of N. When averaged over the entire 90 day evaluation period, the Green Spec 7-7-7 and AS produced the highest mean growth, the Green Spec 16-4-8 and IBDU/AS mixtures produced intermediate growth and Milorganite the least growth.

Based on the visual quality ratings, chlorophyll meter readings, growth rate estimates and total N uptake it appears that the Green Spec 7-7-7 N source was superior to the other N sources in supplying N and promoting the growth of quality cool-season turfgrass during this 90 day evaluation period. This was a relatively short term study and these results should not be used to draw major long term conclusions but the initial results do appear promising and warrant addition study.

PDF

Attachments:
FileDescriptionFile size
 UFL_PoaResponsetoN2007.pdf 11 Kb
 
Facebook.com/griggbros.com
ContactUs_blue2
QUICK LINK
Select A Product

NutrientSummary
release 1/19/2011
space
TOP

The information contained in this website is applicable to the U.S.A. and products and information represented may not be necessarily applicable in any other country depending on that countries rules or regulations. Some products may not be permitted or registered in foreign countries.